Let &Omega. be some abstract set, and let @A_0 be a collection of subsets of &Omega..
Then @A_0 is an #~{algebra} if
A collection , @A, of subsets of &Omega. is a #~{&sigma.-algebra} if.
Note: iii ) &imply. &union._{~i} ~{A_i} &in. @A _ since _ ~{A_i} &in. @A _ &imply. _ ~{A_i}^c &in. @A _ &imply. _ &intersect._{~i} ~{A_i}^c = ( &union._{~i} ~{A_i} )^c &in. @A _ &imply. _ &union._{~i} ~{A_i} &in. @A
&Omega. some abstract set, and ~S a set of subsets of &Omega., _ then the #~{smallest &sigma.-algebra containing} ~S, or the &sigma.-algebra #~{generated} by ~S is denoted &sigma.( ~S ).
This always exists, as ~S &subseteq. 2^{&Omega.}, and if @F and @G are two sub-&sigma.-algebras containing ~S, then &sigma.( S ) &subseteq. @F &intersect. @G
If V is some topological space, then the #~{Borel &sigma.-algebra} on V, is the &sigma.-algebra generated by all the open sets of V, and is denoted @B( V ).
If &reals. is the real line, then the Borel &sigma.-algebra on &reals., _ @B( &reals. ) _ , is often denoted just _ @B.
( &Omega., @A ) is a {measurable space}, a measure P: @A &rightarrow. [0,1] is a #~{probability measure} if _ P( &Omega. ) = 1
( &Omega., @A, P ) is called a #~{probability triple} or just a #~{probability space} .
The following results follow directly from the definition:
If _ ( &Omega., @A, P ) _ is probability space, then elements of @A are known as #~{events} , _ and &Omega. is called the #~{event space}.
#T( @s ) _ = _ \{ &omega. | @s is true for &omega. \}
then note that, if @r is another such statement:#T( @s ) &intersect. #T( @r ) _ = _ \{ &omega. | @s and @r are true for &omega. \}
#T( @s ) &union. #T( @r ) _ = _ \{ &omega. | @s or @r is true for &omega. \}
( #T( @s ) )^c _ = _ \{ &omega. | @s is not true for &omega. \}
The following nomeclature is often used:
~A ~{and} ~B _ = _ ~A &intersect. ~B
~A ~{or} ~B _ = _ ~A &union. ~B
~{not} ~A _ = _ ~A^c
If &Omega. is countable ( or finite ) then ( &Omega., @A, P ) is said to be a #~{discrete probability space}.
In this case we can assign probabilities to the points of &Omega., and this characterizes the space completely.
I.e. _ put _ &Omega. = \{ &omega._{~i} \}_{~i &in. &naturals.}, _ _ ~p_{~i} = P( \{ &omega._{~i} \} )
then
P( ~A ) _ _ _ = _ sum{ _ ~{p_i},\{ ~i | &omega._{~i} &in. ~A \}, _ }
as the \{ &omega._{~i} \} are disjoint
Examples
Roll of one die. &Omega. = \{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 \}
If die is fair then ~p_1 = ~p_2 = ~p_3 = ~p_4 = ~p_5 = ~p_6 = 1/6
Roll of two dice. &Omega. = \{ ( 1,1 ), ( 1,2 ), ... , ( 6,5 ), ( 6,6 ) \}
In this case we assume that the dice are distinguishable, so that, e.g. ( 2, 5 ) &neq. ( 5, 2 )